Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 31  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 87-91

Caudal versus spinal anesthesia in children undergoing lower abdominal operations


Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Ahmed Hashem M. Ismail
Berket El-Sabae, Menoufia
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/mmj.mmj_637_16

Rights and Permissions

Objective The aim of this study was to compare spinal and caudal anesthesia in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries, as regards efficacy of anesthesia, hemodynamics, and postoperative pain. Background General anesthesia in pediatric patients, especially premature children, is one of the most important risk factors for postoperative apnea. Patients and methods The study was a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Totally, 40 children aged 3–12years received either caudal or spinal anesthesia. The outcomes measured were hemodynamics, degree of motor block using Bromage score, pain assessment using Wong–Baker facial grimace scale, degree of sedation, total requirement of postoperative analgesia, complication rate, and parent satisfaction. Results A total of 40 children were included for analysis. Of them, 20 children received caudal and 20 received spinal anesthesia. Heart rate was significantly higher in the caudal group than in the spinal group(P=0.006). The mean score measured using the Wong–Baker facial grimace scale for postoperative pain assessment at 2h in the caudal group was 0.30±0.47, compared with 5.05±3.72 in the spinal group; there was a highly significant statistical difference(P=0.00). The mean score measured using Bromage score at 90min in the caudal group was 3.0±0.00, compared with 2.75±0.44 in the spinal group; there was a significant statistical difference(P=0.021). Therewas no significant statistical difference between the two groups as regards blood pressure changes, oxygen saturation readings, sedation, and complication rate. Conclusion Both caudal and spinal approaches are effective in pediatric patients as anesthesia for lower abdominal operations. However, caudal anesthesia has a relatively longer duration of postoperative analgesia and motor block.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed58    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded16    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal