Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 31  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 114-117

Evaluation of lymphadenectomy in patients receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma


1 General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt
2 General Surgery Department, Shebin El-Kom Teaching Hospital, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Ahmed M Elgarhy
General Surgery Department, Shebin El-Kom Teaching Hospital, Shebin El-Kom
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1110-2098.234218

Rights and Permissions

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluatethe effect of neoadjuvant radiation on total number and number of positive lymph nodes(LNs) inpatientswith rectal adenocarcinoma. Background Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide. Treatments for colorectal cancer include combinations of surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy aims to reduce the size or extent of the cancer before radical-treatment intervention, thus making the procedures easier and more likely to succeed. Patients and methods A total of 20patients with stage 2 and stage 3 cancer were chosen and divided into two groups. The first group included 10patients who received neoadjuvant therapy before radical surgery for rectal cancer. The second group included 10patients who underwent radical surgery for rectal cancer without neoadjuvant therapy. For compression number of LNs in bothgroups before and after course of neoadjuvant and after surgery. Results Neoadjuvant therapy significantly decreased both the number and size of affected LNs in rectal cancer. Conclusion Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with decreased number of affected LNs up to complete clearance. There is a need for more larger randomized trials using preoperative chemoradiotherapy with larger number of patients for better evaluation of response and toxicity in comparison with postoperative chemoradiotherapy.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed60    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded14    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal