Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 928-934

How to avoid the false diagnosis of venous leakage by pharmaco-penile duplex ultrasonography?

Department of Dermatology and Andrology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Mohamed S Abo Hola
Tala, Menoufia Egypt, 32611, Tala
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/1110-2098.218292

Rights and Permissions

Objectives The aim of the present study to carefully reassess the erectile hemodynamic status in men previously diagnosed with venous leak on penile duplex ultrasonography (DUS) under the guidelines of the Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (ASUM). Background Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a widespread problem affecting men across all age groups (about 50% in 40–70-year age group) and disturbing the quality of life of sexually active men. Vascular insufficiency is one of the major causes of ED. DUS is a useful, minimally invasive method for evaluating penile hemodynamics in patients with ED, but has a propensity to inaccurately assign a diagnosis of venous leak. Patients and methods Fifty patients from 18 to 50 years olds selected from the Andrology Unit, Dermatology and Andrology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Egypt were included in the study. All cases were subjected to the following: detailed history, thorough clinical examination, routine and hormonal investigations, and imaging studies including re-evaluation through DUS under the guidelines of ASUM. Results Overall, 50% of the patients previously diagnosed with venous leak were shown to be normal when re-evaluated under the guidelines of ASUM. The other 50% demonstrated a significant improvement in the value of end diastolic velocity (EDV). The study demonstrated a significant increase in the value of peak systolic velocity in repeated DUS with a mean difference of 10.29, and a significant decrease in the value of EDV with a mean difference of 4.19 compared with the original DUS. Our results indicated a significant negative correlation between age and value of peak systolic velocity, and an insignificant positive correlation between age and value of EDV for all participants, in both original and repeated DUS. Conclusion Careful assessment should be carried out when performing DUS, especially in younger men without a significant vascular risk factor in history for ED, to avoid misdiagnosis of venous leak.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded235    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal