Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 21-26

Comparison between VY flap and rhomboid flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus


1 Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menufia, Egypt
2 Department of General Surgery Tala Hospital, Ministry of Health, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Ibrahim Ayman Ibrahim Saadeldin
Tala-Menoufia
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1110-2098.155916

Rights and Permissions

Objective The present work was designed to compare a VY flap and a rhombiod flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus. Background The pilonidal sinus is a tract that usually contains hair. It occurs under the skin between the buttocks (the natal cleft) a short distance above the anus. The sinus track traverses in a vertical direction between the buttocks. Rarely, a pilonidal sinus occurs in other sites of the body such as the axilla, groin, interdigital webs, or the feet. The exact cause is not clear. There are various theories. For example, one theory states that the problem may develop from a minor congenital or hereditary abnormality in the skin of the natal cleft, in which the hair grows into the skin rather than outwards. Materials and methods We studied 30 patients aged 19-47 years (average, 30 ± 10 years) presenting to the outpatient clinic of El-Menoufia university hospital and El-Helal insurance hospital at Shebin El-Kom with pilonidal sinus from December 2012 and May 2013. The patients were followed up until July 2013. A total of 15 patients (50%) were treated with a VY flap and 15 (50%) were treated with a dufourmentel flap. Results The outcome was successful in 14 of 15 patients who received a VY flap and 15 of 15 patients who received a dufourmentel flap. The operative time is shorter in the VY method than the dufourmentel method (P < 0.05). Hospital stay was shorter in the dufourmentel group than the VY group. The duration of follow-up was 6 months in both groups. Recurrence developed in only one patient from the VY group. Excellent results were more commonly observed in younger patients. Conclusion Recovery following treatment with a dufourmentel flap is better than with the other method.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed671    
    Printed7    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded86    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal