Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 490-496

Assessment of limited stage reconstruction of auricular deformities using autogenous costal cartilage

1 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
2 Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Tarek Abd Elrahman Abd Elhafez
MBBCh, MSc, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia 32511
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/1110-2098.141735

Rights and Permissions

Objective To evaluate the results of ear reconstructions in cases of auricular dysplasia utilizing autogenous costal cartilage graft, using two-stage versus three-stage technique of auricular reconstruction. Background Total reconstruction of the absent auricle because of congenital microtia is a complex topic that can be carried out either by alloplastic material or by autogenous material such as costal cartilage. Patients and methods This prospective study evaluated 22 patients with auricular deformities who were presented to ENT and Plastic Surgery Departments. Patients are assessed preoperatively by history, general and local examination. Esthetic assessment, photo documentation, audiological and radiologic evaluation were carried out. The patients were divided into two groups according to the stages of reconstruction: two-stage (using temporalis fascia and skin graft) and three-stage (using tissue expander) reconstruction. Patients were assessed postoperatively according to doctor and patient satisfaction. The latter was measured by Glasgow benefit inventory questionnaire. Results The surgical outcome was good to fair for the majority of the patients in terms of size, texture and shape of the ear, according to doctor satisfaction, with no significant difference between the two techniques (P > 0.05). Regarding patient satisfaction, there were no significant differences between both the techniques (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference between the two techniques regarding postoperative skin texture and the rate of development of postoperative complications in favor of group II, using tissue expander (P = 0.002). Conclusion The microtic ear can be satisfactorily reconstructed using autogenous costal cartilage graft either by two-stage technique (using temporalis fascia flap and skin graft) or three-stage technique (using tissue expander), with no significant difference between the two techniques regarding doctor and patient satisfaction.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded139    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal